Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:04:12 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Just curious - cvsup mirror connect rate? Message-ID: <20041019170412.GV42886@hex.databits.net> In-Reply-To: <20041018203143.GB23076@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20041018203143.GB23076@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--rG09A39trvEtf3rB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> I'm just curious what people typically see for connect rates to the
> main cvsup mirrors.
>=20
> I've got one server here that's desperately in need of more memory
> but it typically services around 2500 connections a day. Another
> cvsup server I've got access to at another site services roughly
> the same number per day.
>=20
> The reason I'm asking is I'm cleaning up some servers that vaporized
> on us. I've started to take over a dead server's name on a large
> server here for at least a day before I turn it over to a new volunteer
> site because of the inevitable slamming that happens when a new server
> takes over for one that had been down for a while. I've done this
> a couple times now and despite the initial load once things settle
> down a bit I've been seeing the same typical number - on average
> around 2500 connects a day.
>=20
> Until now... I just took over cvsup5 for a bit because it had been
> down. In less than 6 hours it's serviced about 11,000 connects. And
> I'm not seeing tons of "Tree comp failure..." messages, the huge majority
> are reporting success. It's been pegged at the 30 connect limit ever
> since I made the DNS change almost 6 hours ago...
>=20
> So, just kind of wondering what people normally see as average traffic
> for a day. If cvsupd has been running all the time your machine has
> been up simply taking the current connect number it's allocating and
> dividing by the number of days it's been up is close enough. :-)
> I'm kind of wondering if the number of hits you get is a function
> of what cvsupN number you get - when people first set themselves
> up they start at cvsup1 and go up until they find one that doesn't
> say its full and then set up their cron job to use that one... :-)
I think the imbalance is because people (falsely) rely on a
program called "fastest_cvsup" to choose the mirror to use. This
program only measures network performance of the cvsup mirrors in
question & thus leads them to use a mirror that is not
necessarily their best choice. The fact is that the network
performance means little when it comes to cvsup, especially for
updates. CPU, RAM, disk I/O of the server mean a lot more.
This particularly affects cvsup12 since its outbound link is
frequently saturated. The statistics are, for this month:
will@sanmateo% for i in `jot -w '%02d' 18 1`;do echo -n "2004/10/${i}: ";gr=
ep ^2004.10.${i} cvsupd.log | grep ": +"|wc -l;done
2004/10/01: 1255
2004/10/02: 1218
2004/10/03: 1152
2004/10/04: 1305
2004/10/05: 1349
2004/10/06: 1250
2004/10/07: 1314
2004/10/08: 1253
2004/10/09: 1252
2004/10/10: 1188
2004/10/11: 1212
2004/10/12: 866
2004/10/13: 1265
2004/10/14: 1246
2004/10/15: 1288
2004/10/16: 1267
2004/10/17: 1225
2004/10/18: 1324
At last count, this server had served 159,208 connections since
it was last restarted July 13th & rarely sees load avgs above 2.0
& almost never above 10.0. On a particularly good day, it serves
1500-1600 clients.
Regards,
--=20
wca
--rG09A39trvEtf3rB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBdUkLF47idPgWcsURAvLAAJ9hkMcV4bUs/65YupQ22imtFdrUUwCcD1ee
BgQYJelG2UTPO6ls7lRqvDQ=
=wYi7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rG09A39trvEtf3rB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041019170412.GV42886>