Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:42:12 +0200 From: Krassimir Slavchev <krassi@bulinfo.net> To: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est Message-ID: <479F2D34.4020907@bulinfo.net> In-Reply-To: <479D91C1.2050409@moneybookers.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080126030624.9572A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <479D83E3.5030101@bulinfo.net> <479D91C1.2050409@moneybookers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Lambrev wrote: > Greetings, > > Krassimir Slavchev wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Ian Smith wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, John Baldwin wrote: >>> > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 02:42:52 am Krassimir Slavchev wrote: >>> > > John Baldwin wrote: >>> > > > On Monday 21 January 2008 11:16:06 am Gerrit Kühn wrote: >>> > > >> Hi folks, >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I have several systems using T7200 mobile CPUs running under >>> 7-stable. >>> > > >> However, EST does not recognize the cpus. When loading >>> cpufreq I get: >>> > > > >>> > > > You can try this patch. It won't add support for all of the >>> levels, but it >>> > > > will support the current level and the highest level (IIRC). >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > It works now on my T7700: >>> > > > > dev.est.0.%desc: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control >>> > > dev.est.0.%driver: est >>> > > dev.est.0.%parent: cpu0 >>> > > dev.est.0.freq_settings: 2401/35000 2400/35000 2000/28000 >>> 1600/22000 >>> > > 1200/16000 >>> > > dev.est.1.%desc: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control >>> > > dev.est.1.%driver: est >>> > > dev.est.1.%parent: cpu1 >>> > > dev.est.1.freq_settings: 2401/35000 2400/35000 2000/28000 >>> 1600/22000 >>> > > 1200/16000 >>> > > Odd, it shouldn't have provided that many settings. It also >>> doesn't >>> > provide power info. I wonder if you are getting the settings from >>> > ACPI. >>> >>> Assuming so, wouldn't this seem to be an instance needing the recent: >>> >>> kern/114722: [acpi] [patch] Nearly duplicate p-state entries >>> reported http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114722 >>> >> >> With this patch the result is the same. >> > Patched src/sys/kern/kern_cpu.c is already in RELENG_7_0. > It was submitted 8 days ago. > Are you sure your sources are newer then this? > No, they where almost 2 weeks older. I have just upgraded to todays 7.0 and the result is the same. Best Regards -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHny00xJBWvpalMpkRAg2BAJ4yyzbsJN1hOGxOaZnbeicuCrxgXgCeKzED WDlJ8bx9oqPCmt3jHZ8ecrQ= =taHu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?479F2D34.4020907>