Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:25:58 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/quake2lnx Makefile distinfo pkg-message pkg-plist ports/games/quake2lnx/files extra-patch-src_rogue_g__local.h extra-patch-src_rogue_q__shared.c extra-patch-src_xatrix_q__shared.c patch-Makefile patch-src::game::g_phys.c patch-src::linux::gl_glx.c patch-src::linux::rw_in_svgalib.c ... Message-ID: <20051117192558.GB48431@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051117135427.GA34190@FreeBSD.org> References: <200511171051.jAHApSWX074582@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051117133108.GA29488@FreeBSD.org> <1132234974.79514.12.camel@localhost> <20051117135427.GA34190@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:54:27PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 02:42:54PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2005 v 13:31 +0000: > >=20 > > > > PR: ports/87181 > > > > Submitted by: Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz> > > > > Approved by: maintainer timeout > > >=20 > > > Edwin, > > >=20 > > > I wish I could say "thanks" for work you've done, but I would appreci= ate > > > private confirmation mail even in case of "maintainer timeout". This= is > > > a complicated port, and such a change is potentially harmful due to i= ts > > > massiveness. Commits like this should probably be done per-piece fas= hion, > > > otherwise it's really hard to check if nothing got broken. Not to > > > mention that I actually disagree on the number of changes suggested in > > > the PR (and committed by you). > > >=20 > > > I'm not asking for a backout, in fact I realize how annoying it can be > > > when PR hangs in "open" state for a month(s), and I would have probab= ly > > > needed to change PR state to something like "working on it, please be > > > patient", however, I must say I got somewhat frustrated to have to fix > > > all those things that I don't like WRT this commit. > >=20 > > So why have you not handled the PR yourself? Is 36 days really not > > enough to sort out a single port PR? >=20 > As I have said, proposed changes were pretty controversial, and I was in > fact not sure whether I really wanted them in my port. I *was* working > on it, albeit rather time-sparsely, exchanged a few emails with submitter. > I can tolerate "maintainer timeout" for really inactive committer, but > not for someone doing commits and being active in the lists. >=20 > I'll go and shut up now, telling myself to take care of my ports faster > next time. :-) All you needed to do was to either reply to the PR or mark it analyzed so it was clear you were working on it. Kris --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDfNlGWry0BWjoQKURAmvsAKDn1BWb1KkwdJqsSm0mXpqXaZwZnwCeIB3c oDjxHXb32ykWqLNCqAHEwEA= =vROo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051117192558.GB48431>