Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:40:04 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> To: William LeFebvre <bill@lefebvre.org> Cc: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org, Nikola Le??i?? <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net>, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for testing - top 3.8b1 in the base system Message-ID: <20080928204004.GB87271@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <48DFDF25.2090905@lefebvre.org> References: <20080928054620.GA80250@k7.mavetju> <20080928142409.19f94e5b@anthesphoria.net> <20080928193825.GC87069@icarus.home.lan> <48DFDF25.2090905@lefebvre.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:46:45PM -0400, William LeFebvre wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Nikola Le??i?? wrote: > >>> Is it normal to have 100.64% for cc1? >> >> I would assume so, as your machine has more than one logical or >> physical processor. >> > > No, that was a per-thread display he posted. Altho undesirable I can > come up with some plausible reasons why it is exceeding 100%, all > related to the uncertainty of trying to perform accurate measurements on > a moving target. I suppose I could cap the percentage at 100 just for > aesthetic reasons, and to keep it from overflowing the column. Ah ha. That could also explain why gstat(8) has the same problem (%busy column occasionally being >100, sometimes 102-103%). A simple & 100 on the displayed value should suffice, yep. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080928204004.GB87271>