Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:39:50 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: vman@tmok.com Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64415: make in ports stopped by ASCII GUI Message-ID: <4059D0D6.2090807@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040318162457.GA36338@k2.homeunix.net> References: <4059B9E9.80802@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> <4059BD4E.7040803@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318152648.GA91776@k2.homeunix.net> <4059C4E1.5050009@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318160038.GA674@k2.homeunix.net> <4059CBEC.7040405@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318162457.GA36338@k2.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vlad Manilici wrote: > Hi Oliver, > >>Sofar, sogood. I guess it would be much clearer if we had a prototype >>patch to see clearly what you have in mind. Be aware though, that >>OPTIONS handling is not as easy as it seems. > > Well, most of the questions referred to building in some debug behaviour. > Plus a couple I did not really take the time to investigate. > > Would a fix for /etc/make.conf suit as a patch? Fixing all packets is > tremendous work, plus discussions with the maintainers... You can't patch /etc/make.conf, since it's not part of the FreeBSD distribution. I guess patching the ports would accomplish nothing, and normally we prefer if ports behave consistently. Whatever you had in mind, couldn't you just simply send the patch, so I can clearly see what you are trying to do? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4059D0D6.2090807>