Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 12:08:34 +0200 (EET) From: Seppo Kallio <kallio@cc.jyu.fi> To: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Risk of having bpf0? (was URGENT: Packet sniffer found on my system) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.961211115116.4205M-100000@silmu.cc.jyu.fi> In-Reply-To: <199612110927.LAA02201@silver.sms.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We have some shell users, look at http://www/~kallio/atk/loadcurves/gif/uall-long.jpg There is the total number of simultaneous users at 14 o'clock daily at nodes silmu.cc.jyu.fi, itu.cc.jyu.fi, kanto.cc.jyu.fi, tukki.cc.jyu.fi, tarzan.math.jyu.fi and voimax.voima.jkl.fi itu, silmu run FreeBSD 2.1.5, kanto, tukki run Solaris, voimax run Linux RedHat 3.0.3 (voimax has heavy load but few shell users) On x-axis there is day number (day 0 = 1.1.1996). At day 300 we had about 350 users at 14 o'clock. day 300 is somewhere in October 1996. Daily user count of FreeBSD nodes is in http://www/~kallio/atk/loadcurves/gif/users2.jpg Page http://www/~kallio/atk/loadcurves/load.html has pointers to all gifs I am collecting (base is rsh host uptime + some C code + gnuplot). There is some differeces between OSes in user count number of uptime Seppo On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Petri Helenius wrote: > We're in violent agreement here. On both the tightness and the fact > that it's becoming rarer. > > Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.92.961211115116.4205M-100000>