Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:33:18 -0700 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: conrads@cox.net Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion Message-ID: <1090629198.44506.3.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040723192528.conrads@cox.net> References: <XFMail.20040723192528.conrads@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:25, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On 24-Jul-2004 Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >> > >> Just one question: have the inconsistencies been worked out in > >> translating XFree86 fonts package dependencies to Xorg fonts > >> packages? Have all ports that depend on XFree86 fonts packages > >> been adjusted, and if so, how was this issue resolved? > > > > Yes, it was dealt with by making those ports point at the font > > package that provides truetype fonts. > > OK, but then what about the dependencies on Type1 fonts? Those have > all just been dropped? Might it not be better to ensure that both > packages are listed now as dependencies? Do those package actually depend on type1 fonts? If so, then they should be fixed to depend on them. I didn't investigate deeply. I'm pretty sure they just want a pretty scalable font. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1090629198.44506.3.camel>