Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:23:23 +0200
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: Adding a ``user'' mount option
Message-ID:  <4430BF5B.80406@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4430BA79.2030403@freebsd.org>
References:  <1144042356.824.16.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <4430BA79.2030403@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Colin Percival wrote:
> Generally speaking it's much better to add a new setuid program which does
> exactly what you need, rather than making an existing and possibly insecure
> program setuid.

Generally speaking I agree with you. To minimize the impact of having to
run a different 'mount' executable (that I doubt desktop environments
will likely do) it would be nice if 'mount' could automatically run
'usermount' if called by a regular user.

--
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4430BF5B.80406>