Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:40:57 +0200
From:      Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs>
To:        Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Cc:        mm@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Latest c-icap update
Message-ID:  <20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa@mimar.rs>
In-Reply-To: <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it>
References:  <53B68E11.10905@netfence.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:20:49 +0200
Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:

> I see lots of bug reports on the net wrt to c-icap on FreeBSD and
> signal 11; however I believe they are all referring to old, now
> solved, problems. Is it so?

Those are probably mostly mine. I can't get squidclamav get to work on
10.0 without exiting on signals 10 and 11. I had a correspondence in
March directly with Gilles Darold, author of squidclamav. He was
helpful, sending me experimental code for testing, but finally
instructed me to "use a Linux distribution instead I think you will be
more sure to have a working solution", until he figures things out.

Since then, I am monitoring ports for new versions of c-icap and
squidclamav, update every time new port is out, enable squidclamav in
squid configuration only to see it crashing after a few minutes, then
disabling it back.

My PR opened here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D190336
--=20
Marko Cupa=C4=87



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140704144057.c0c29ba0a9b10968ddcfaaaa>