Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:16:13 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/exports: 192.168.5 = 192.168.0.5 Message-ID: <200103250816.f2P8GDh07835@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103250921180.3061-100000@arnold.neland.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Leif Neland wrote: > Bug or pilot error? > > My network is 192.168.5.0 > > I used to have im my /etc/exports: > > /var -alldirs -maproot=root: -network 192.168.5 -mask 255.255.255.0 > > But after the portmapper change, I couldn't mount, was getting permission > denied. > > showmount -e showed 192.168.5 was being interpreted as 192.168.0.5 > > Changing -network to 192.168.5.0 fixed it, naturally, but the 192.168.5 > used to work. > > Is this change intentional, or is 192.168.5 supposed to work? > > Leif My buest guess is that this is because it is now using something like inet_addr() for decoding the address instead of some roll-your-own code. FWIW, this zero fill is a standard part of the system: peter@daintree[11:24pm]~src/sys/pci-142> ping 192.168.5 PING 192.168.5 (192.168.0.5): 56 data bytes .. peter@daintree[12:13am]~src/sys/pci-143> ping 127.1 PING 127.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.068 ms .. This is far more prolific in IPv6. Eg: "ping ::1" is localhost. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103250816.f2P8GDh07835>