Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:35:27 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> To: Larry Baird <lab@gta.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: differences in USB support between FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x ? Message-ID: <20030722113527.GF78496@genius.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030721224636.39455.qmail@gta.com> References: <20030721175214.16861.qmail@gta.com> <20030721224636.39455.qmail@gta.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:46:36PM -0000, Larry Baird wrote: > > 5.x seems to have much better support for USB 2.0 as well. I have > > a SanDisk 2.0 USB compact flash reader that just works with 5.1 release. > > So far no amount of kernel hacking has made it work with 4.8. > > Unfortunetly for me I need it to work under 4.8. )-: > As a follow up to this problem report. The problem turned out to be > the USB hub I was using on my 4.8 box. I would have sworn I tested > without the hub last week when I first had problems. But alas I must > have dreamed I made this test. All is well under 5.1 and 4.8 with my > SanDisk USB 2.0 compact flash reader. (-: > I wish that all usb problems that that easy to solve! :) Joe -- Josef Karthauser (joe@tao.org.uk) http://www.josef-k.net/ FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker) http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/ Physics Particle Theory (student) http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/ ================ An eclectic mix of fact and theory. =================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722113527.GF78496>