Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 May 2005 20:01:52 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Mike Jeays <Mike.Jeays@rogers.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Ports update gone badly wrong
Message-ID:  <20050502030152.GA30662@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1115002625.89282.3.camel@chaucer>
References:  <1114807030.3078.12.camel@chaucer> <20050429214445.GB57046@xor.obsecurity.org> <1115002625.89282.3.camel@chaucer>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:57:05PM -0400, Mike Jeays wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 17:44, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:37:10PM -0400, Mike Jeays wrote:
> > > I think I have made a horrendeous mess of my workstation.  I have been
> > > running 5.3 with no problem, and then I tried to csvup the ports file=
s,
> > > using the following section in ports-supfile.  Note I didn't change t=
he
> > > release tag!  I updated a few of the ports, including Evolution and
> > > Firefox, and had trouble with missing libraries, such as libgthread ..
> > > 400 having been rename to ..600..
> > >=20
> > > The machine now feels less stable than an old version of Windows.=20
> > > Things like Tk.pm and other Perl modules no longer work, and won't
> > > reinstall.  I had to copy over the missing libraries for Evolution and
> > > Firefox from another machine.
> > >=20
> > > Any advice for recovery, other than a re-installation and fresh start?
> > > What should I do next time?
> >=20
> > Use portupgrade to update your ports.  What you did wrong was updated
> > a port that provides a library without updating the ports that depend
> > on that library.
> >=20
> > Kris
>=20
> Thanks for the varying replies.  I tried running portupgrade -arR, and
> it seems to have worked quite well - almost all the ports are now up to
> date, and the system seems to work properly.  It took over 24 hours,
> partly because some ports stop and ask questions, and the process needs
> occasional attention.

You can choose the default settings by setting the BATCH environment
variable.

Kris

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCdZgfWry0BWjoQKURAk4RAKDY/x9M66hT1hMsckHyZZjWEMArHQCbBLhC
9/xSbExs9ujqd3uRcr1U2no=
=BT1M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050502030152.GA30662>