Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:47:25 -0700
From:      Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>,  "freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Arch" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: watchdog end-user interface
Message-ID:  <CAGHfRMCEfO=cCS8MMOf7BRKrCCqGJb-QoQYmpGQK9GUQ%2BxMsLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a74df08-b5d9-5629-b71e-b577d8876e5d@freebsd.org>
References:  <ec3dfab5-c3bc-e9e5-181e-8c2704f60acd@FreeBSD.org> <7a74df08-b5d9-5629-b71e-b577d8876e5d@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> wrote:
...
> Please look at the Linux interface for watchdogs, it is pretty good and
> could/should be ported to us.

We (Isilon) also have a software watchdog implementation (in lieu of
IPMI+watchdogd) to make sure "userspace processes are making
progress".

It would be nice if there was a generalized software watchdog
subsystem available in FreeBSD -- I think your suggestion to follow
Linux's example may be a good investigative step to avoid reinventing
the wheel too much.

Thanks!
-Ngie



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGHfRMCEfO=cCS8MMOf7BRKrCCqGJb-QoQYmpGQK9GUQ%2BxMsLw>