Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:07:41 -0700
From:      Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org>
To:        Andrej Zverev <andrej.zverev@gmail.com>
Cc:        "perl@FreeBSD.org" <perl@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ports/181914: net/p5-Socket-GetAddrInfo fails to build package
Message-ID:  <5237650D.4080409@jetcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5bB%2BhK6MUhUURBFTwrgxRLcm_PczjSRoLhoX6QmeTvwpEA2w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201309161830.r8GIU1EU041596@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAD5bB%2BhK6MUhUURBFTwrgxRLcm_PczjSRoLhoX6QmeTvwpEA2w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/16/13 11:39, Andrej Zverev wrote:
> This version (0.22) somehow is totally broken.

I can't really tell. It appeared to pass the tests in the work directory.

> Installing own files in
> random way (or at least I can't understand logic). So if you change it
> this way it will also be broken in another way. (pkg-plist)
> I think right way:
> 1. Revert to 0.21
> 2. Avoid automatic install and write custom do-install target

Can you explain this in more detail? I was able to produce what seems to 
be the correct package by my hack.

If you look at pkg-plist, it has this set of substitutions. Without 
someone to explain what these substitutions are for and why one would or 
would not want them, it's hard to really understand what you mean. :)
-- 
Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org
 >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<<

The most important service rendered by the press is that of
educating people to approach printed matter with distrust.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5237650D.4080409>