Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:04:54 -0700
From:      "Darren Pilgrim" <dmp@bitfreak.org>
To:        "'Petri Helenius'" <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Which em(4) chips work/don't work? [Was: RE: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-((]
Message-ID:  <000001c5c972$b7cf0660$662a15ac@smiley>
In-Reply-To: <43436A0E.1060004@he.iki.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete@he.iki.fi]=20
>=20
> Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>=20
>> I'd be interested in finding out the specific chips with which people =
are
>> (not) having success.  As em(4) supports an entire family of =
products,
>> rather than a single chip, it may be that some chips have quirks or =
other
>> gotchas the driver needs to address.  It certainly wouldn't be the =
first
>> occurance of revision-specific bugs.
>
> I would also not discount motherboard / PCI speed related issues.

Indeed.  I've only had a few replies and already have opposing reports.  =
I'm
volunteering to collect the data, but I'll have to talk to someone in a
position to do code work about what data should be tracked.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c5c972$b7cf0660$662a15ac>