Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:30:13 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Plassche <dplassche@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [maybe spam] Re: FreeBSD 1.x Binaries Work Except under Chroot Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=x8OyNNsYfz-Ffb2F9JrRS3_NJ_kBZx5duzzOmAsN7aA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <62153.1345056899@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <CAJ-Vmo=yzCz_jDhTVQ3kyHgxDnUTvzqZPp%2BsDSz%2BZWe7cYmpJQ@mail.gmail.com> <62153.1345056899@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 August 2012 11:54, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <CAJ-Vmo=yzCz_jDhTVQ3kyHgxDnUTvzqZPp+sDSz+ZWe7cYmpJQ@mail.gmail.com> > , Adrian Chadd writes: >>Holy. Crap. 17 seconds? >> >>Can we please go back to having it take this long? please? > > 386BSD was even better, and I have a machine that boots it in less > than 15 seconds from power-on... :-) Embedded systems stuff will love you if we could slim the build and binary/library size down by this much. Sheesh, compilers do a lot of work these days, don't they? Has anyone done a (recent) comparison of execution size/efficiency given the evolution of GCC? Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=x8OyNNsYfz-Ffb2F9JrRS3_NJ_kBZx5duzzOmAsN7aA>