Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:57:22 +0100 
From:      James Mansion <james@westongold.com>
To:        Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>, vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu
Cc:        freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG, kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE
Subject:   RE: hw platform Q - what's a good smp choice these days? 
Message-ID:  <32BABEF63EAED111B2C5204C4F4F502017F7@WGP01>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Its all very well, but SCSI disks are a LOT more expensive than IDE
ones.

Might be faster IO per drive with SCSI, but I'd rather have twice the
capacity and spend the remainder on more RAM.

James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Passe [mailto:smp@csn.net]
>
SNIP
> 
> > If you are going to multiple disks and have the money, SCSI is the
> > way to go.  But IDE disks are so much less!  For a single drive,
> > the new IDE DMA driver does as well as SCSI.
> 
> I agree with this point, but I think of SCSI as much more than a disk
> controller.  I typically hang a jaz or zip drive off it, plus a SCSI
> DAT tape for backup, or possibly a scanner, or a CD-ROM drive, or ...
> 
> --
> Steve Passe	| powered by
> smp@csn.net	|            Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
> 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32BABEF63EAED111B2C5204C4F4F502017F7>