Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 00:09:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error: Orphaned: @unexec rmdir "/home" >/dev/null 2>&1 || : (PING) Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407060005390.30120@tuna.site> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407010020540.30120@tuna.site> References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406201407010.4149@tuna.site> <CAALwa8mSJzzYN=LwBL0nK3MMMukGx4JYOg5othrbBpKxjUBeNQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406301616250.30120@tuna.site> <CAALwa8ncd-3oEeuCn0-u1S03uA2Fohg-L7v0xGHHbr%2BsX5HnAw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407010020540.30120@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> It's LOCALBASE that points to /home/gerald/10-i386, so I am really
>>> puzzled about those @unexec rmdir's that want to remove my LOCALBASE.
>> You can try attached patch.
> Cool. That fixes the issue in my tests.
Thinking a bit more about this: Doesn't this just silence the
diagnostics, while "something" still adds those entries to the
package that trie to remove the parent directories of LOCALBASE?
That is, shouldn't those @unexec rmdir's not be added beyond
("higher") than LOCALBASE?
Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.11.1407060005390.30120>