Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 May 2004 05:07:53 +0400 (MSD)
From:      Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject:   Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing
Message-ID:  <20040507050215.F5417@mp3files.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <409AD3D0.DF5114F@freebsd.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405061557410.82978-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <409AD3D0.DF5114F@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...]
> May I propose an default setting for IP options which allows for RR but
> restricts the packet size that will be acted upon and is rate limited like
> many of our ICMP replies to certain other events like closed ports etc?
> This would satisfy the RR tracers and make Jaques and me more happy than
> we are with the current situation.

Rate limit is OK.  Probably the packet size restrictions is OK too.
Do not think we need a special case for RR.

I hope you are not going to turn off ip fragmentation/reassembling by
default to make SO happy, aren't you?

-- 
Maxim Konovalov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507050215.F5417>