Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:26:55 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Subject: Re: powerd(8) Message-ID: <200504191026.55803.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050418232944.271AD5D07@ptavv.es.net> References: <20050418232944.271AD5D07@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart20628293.OurAszTEo5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:59, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I also have found that changing the polling interval to 150 is an > improvement. Half a second is just too long, IMHO. I also discovered > that with my system (P4M) that some settings can use substantially more > power than faster settings, so I have kludged an ugly hack to avoid > those settings. These changes make a significant difference in power > consumption. Can you elaborate on these? It may be worth adding a general algorithm to cull the frequency list power= d=20 uses based on this info. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart20628293.OurAszTEo5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCZFdX5ZPcIHs/zowRAj+/AJoC7UkemH2SAsBquRV6j6aikIVzkACeNeSW REcpM92Yo2nytrdztMX2U+g= =VIKz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart20628293.OurAszTEo5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504191026.55803.doconnor>