Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 15:27:34 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: davidg@root.com Cc: terry@lambert.org, phk@critter.tfs.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Add new slice to running system, comments? Message-ID: <199601082227.PAA10601@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199601082117.NAA01757@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Jan 8, 96 01:17:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Shouldn't this (well, loose meaning of "should" in this case, since I don't > >agree with half of the VEXEC crap) result in an EBUSY? > > No. VEXEC only means that you can't write to it. Doing an rm just marks the > file for delete since it is still open by something else. This is the desired > behavior. I was thinking in terms of create strategy for dnodes. This is very specific to the MSDOSFS itself. What you say is generally true. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601082227.PAA10601>