Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:30:36 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BlackBerry (Re: using libusb) Message-ID: <200801111930.37320.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <200801111323.58302@aldan> References: <200801090114.56195@aldan> <200801111910.41509.hselasky@c2i.net> <200801111323.58302@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 11 January 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On =D0'=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=D1 11 =D3=A6=DE=C5=CE=D8 2008, Hans Petter Selasky= wrote: > =3D /dev/usb<bus_no>.<dev_no>.<iface_no>.<ep_no> > [...] > =3D What do you think ? > > I still prefer the elegance of /dev/umassX and /dev/ugenY to the > nameless /dev/usbX.Y.Z > > For example, all SCSI devices have names (da, st, cd, pt, etc.), even > though they are all identified by the SCSI bus number, ID, and LUN. Hi, I think you misunderstand. If there is a mass storage device it will appear= =20 like /dev/da0. If there is a libusb device it will have to use /dev/usbX.Y.= Z. =2D-HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801111930.37320.hselasky>