Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:34:00 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        wscott@pdxlx008.intel.com (Wayne Scott)
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, terry@lambert.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org, dyson@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Optimization topics
Message-ID:  <199601302034.NAA07203@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199601301837.KAA07469@pdxlx008.intel.com.intel.com> from "Wayne Scott" at Jan 30, 96 10:37:55 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I might have an easier solution for you.
> 
> The Pentium Pro has a misaligned access performance counter that has
> the ability to generate interrupts.  You can tell the processor to
> count misaligns and generate an interrupt every 1000 times it sees
> one.
> 
> Put this into you existing profiling code and you will get a profile
> of where the system is doing misaligned references.  Now you only need
> to fix the very common cases in the critical paths.
> 
> The same thing can be done which all the counters.  Which branches are
> not predicted well, where am I missing the cache, etc...
> 
> The information is in the P6 PRM that should be available next month...

I want a MIPS port.  All unaligned access is to be forbidden, not just
where it may impact performance.

Unaligned access is one of the things tying Win95 to Intel.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601302034.NAA07203>