Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:21:05 -0300
From:      William Grzybowski <william88@gmail.com>
To:        Lothar Braun <lothar@lobraun.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: mount ext2fs - geom_label
Message-ID:  <20080721172105.GA16665@venon.lost.garden>
In-Reply-To: <4884ABAE.2080605@lobraun.de>
References:  <20080707113401.GA1672@venon.lost.garden> <g4t17t$2u6$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080707123655.GA1917@venon.lost.garden> <4884ABAE.2080605@lobraun.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:30:54PM +0200, Lothar Braun wrote:
> William Grzybowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:12:44PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> William Grzybowski wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I'm running -CURRENT from 4 July.
>>>> I can mount my ext3 partition without any errors but I can't access it:
>>>>
>>>> # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /media/
>>>> # cd /media
>>>> cd: not a directory: /media
>>>> # ls /media
>>>> ls: /media: Bad file descriptor
>
> [snip]
>
>> The label was "/", I did change it to "st" and unfortunelly this issue still exists...
>>
>>>> I'm not sure if this slice was mounting fine over an older build but for sure it is ext3.
>>>> Another partition with ext3 is (at least was) working.
>>>>
>>>> Am I missing something? Is that some kind of bug? Should i file it?
>
> Can you check the inode size on both file systems (tune2fs -l  
> /dev/<device_name> | grep Inode)? Do they differ?

Right, this seems to be my problem,
the working partition has the inode size of 128 and the non working
256...

Thank you.

>
> I encountered a similar problems with a file system that had an inode  
> size of 265 bytes. FreeBSD wasn't able to handle them correctly (see  
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/124621)
>
> Best regards,
>   Lothar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080721172105.GA16665>