Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread Makefile src/lib/libpthread/test sigsuspend_d.c src/lib/libpthread/thread thr_cancel.c thr_concurrency.c thr_nanosleep.c thr_private.h thr_sig.c thr_sigmask.c ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307181726010.14696-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030719001523.GA85201@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > Who are "the arches"? KSE is a new feature, so the responsibility is on > the KSE developers to complete their implementation on all Tier-1 > platforms. I've offered Alpha boxes to all the KSE developers and have > had zero takers... (same for i386 SMP boxes... but that's another story) > I dont know the alpha and having a box isn't going to help that. I can "guide" soemone who DOES know it as to what the kernel MD parts should do but I'm not in a position to code them. They are pretty trivial to describe, but you need to know a lot about the architecture in question to know how each function should be achieved. I guess what I should do is produce a recipe as to what needs to be added to to each architecture's MD files to 'complete' that architecture. With that I think specialists in each architecture should have little problem filling in the gaps.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0307181726010.14696-100000>