Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:13:33 +0600 From: Stanislav Sedov <ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make(1) is broken? Message-ID: <20060810211333.2d0a73fe@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200608101311.k7ADBDWn075286@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <freebsd-hackers.20060810160836.40eb4128@localhost> <200608101311.k7ADBDWn075286@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:11:13 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> mentioned: > I think it is better not to rely on that side effect. It > isn't well documented and might change without notice in > the future. Thanks for explanation. I suppose, however, that .for behavior could be used rather safely for it's well documented in make(1). According to this manpage, it's not a side effect - .for loops always unrolled and variable substitutions occurs. Thanks for all answers!=20 --=20 Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. <ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru> =F2=CF=D3=D3=C9=D1, =ED=CF=D3=CB=D7=C1 http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 --Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE200dK/VZk+smlYERAtyXAJ9YV/BhG74rMVtOnQSOYfE15HclTgCeMMtt B0eg1XiQqQRPFfXuc02Y40M= =BjTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_PaWuBzfNzXK8wyQ_AtEnG6h--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060810211333.2d0a73fe>