Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: parformance patch?
Message-ID:  <20070804093853.F24954@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20070803202757.GA68434@rot26.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20070803172639.F17414@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20070803164621.GA65921@rot26.obsecurity.org> <20070803220027.C19191@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20070803202757.GA68434@rot26.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> loaded servers for over a year with FreeBSD 6.2
>
> Lucky you ;) Doesn't mean that parts of the kernel you're not using
> can handle it.

well - it exactly mean that it can :)

>> better.
>>
>>
>> patched vm_fault make pageins faster, but not pageout. disks often does
>> write caching clustering pageouts anyway, but probably not that efficient.
>
> This is pageout, not pagein.  Probably the negative effect is that the
> when paging out the system does I/O in larger chunks, improving swap
> throughput but increasing delays for other applications.

actually i tested changing it to 64 it was positive improvement, but after 
shutting down kernel crashed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070804093853.F24954>