Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 09:33:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208529] Error setting up SSL_CTX client key and cert and control-enable: no Message-ID: <bug-208529-8-6WG012l3jd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208529-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208529-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208529 Frans-Jan van Steenbeek <frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net --- Comment #3 from Frans-Jan van Steenbeek <frans-jan@van-steenbeek.net> -= -- Created attachment 170744 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170744&action= =3Dedit Suggested patch See attached suggested patch. Assuming people use unbound-control with local_unbound is a bit of a stretc= h, especially since unbound-control-setup isn't even bundled. This patch tests= the functionality of the local resolver, which is just as good or even better t= han querying the state. It assumes that local_unbound is configured to run on I= Pv4 localhost and that the .com zone is not somehow disabled or inaccessible. T= hese assumptions are *way* smaller than assuming unbound-control works. Besides that, failure is less "messy" to look at. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208529-8-6WG012l3jd>