Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:12:11 +0100
From:      "Ronald Klop" <ronald-lists@klop.ws>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0?
Message-ID:  <op.xcaxml0kkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
In-Reply-To: <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:00:22 +0100, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
>> I wonder why
>>
>> bsdtar --one-file-system
>>
>> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention of
>> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :(
>>
>
>      --one-file-system
>              (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points.
>
> Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Was
> it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're
> seeing.

The question is if the mountpoint (directory in the 'current' filesystem)  
itself should be tarred. After untarring you can than make the same mounts  
again, for example.

Ronald.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.xcaxml0kkndu52>