Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:45:17 -0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. Message-ID: <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What is the practical diference? Performance? FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are: > Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8 > Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII > Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch) > Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with > serial-parallel bridge. > > At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500, > David Gilbert wrote: > >>Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives? >>The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an >>SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA >>natively?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41A1FB7D.9000308>