Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 19:27:10 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Joachim Isaksson <Joachim.Isaksson@ibfs.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au>, Luoqi Chen <luoqi@chen.ml.org> Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux Message-ID: <XFMail.990415192710.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <004201be8724$e7b89a40$8cbc2dc1@ibfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15-Apr-99 Joachim Isaksson wrote: > If on the other hand they limited Linux to 960MB of RAM by not doing proper > tuning, that's another matter... There are 2Gb patches for Linux apparently.. I read in one rebuttal to the test (the Linux World News) that NT server was only using 1Gb of RAM too, so its a non issue. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990415192710.doconnor>