Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:29:38 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap Message-ID: <20050807182938.GC61057@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <42F649C1.4050009@samsco.org> References: <42F47C0D.2020704@freebsd.org> <20050806092232.GA850@zaphod.nitro.dk> <42F489DC.1080400@freebsd.org> <20050807115927.GA851@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20050807173003.GA7290@soaustin.net> <42F649C1.4050009@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:49:53AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: [snip] > I think that portsnap is a very good feature and I'm ready to tout it > for the 6.0 release. The technical problems, such as they are, are Maybe we should add some sysinstall(8) hooks to enable portsnap within it? (If this is considered I would say I am volunteering to do that). Another handy application I would want to see in the base system is portaudit, as it audits vulnerabilities in the base system as well. Will this be considered? Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9lMS/cVsHxFZiIoRAjxtAJ9tRlf4ZS/JH/gTPcpM93kK/T56IwCfWmuQ kpvaurbJeeexPlE17sCtlJI= =UmUN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050807182938.GC61057>