Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:21:07 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator Message-ID: <20060617082107.GA84082@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <1150406643.1475.18.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <1150406643.1475.18.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:24:03AM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 00:13 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:05:53 +0400 Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > > > Actually, i wasn't able to test it, cause the only port i use - > > > linux-ePSXe - doesn't run without linprocfs and it's not available as > > > module now. > > > > Linprocfs is available to auto/manual mounting after installing > > default linux base port. Linux_base-fc4 is preferred now as it may > > become a default linux base port soon. Pay attention on the messages > > after installing the port. > > > > > > WBR > > I do pay attention to the messages when installing the fc-4 port, but > there's no linprocfs.ko with the patch provided by Roman, so I'm unable > to kldload it.. looking at the linprocfs/Makefile I dont see any reason why it shouldnt build on amd64, you try by "cd /sys/modules/linprocfs && make". I dont have amd64 atm and I want to focus on UNIMPL && messages + TLS now... anyway - the linprocfs and linuxolator are separate issues. do you guys think that the amd64 modul is "ok enough" to be commited? roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060617082107.GA84082>