Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:05:22 -0500
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Pedro Sam <p2sam@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New
Message-ID:  <4034FAE2.3010403@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <200402191058.54306.p2sam@yahoo.com>
References:  <BAY5-DAV83NARFuuyC400007545@hotmail.com> <4033C774.2030206@daleco.biz> <16436.4522.353718.896339@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200402191058.54306.p2sam@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pedro Sam wrote:
> On Wednesday February 18 2004 20:30, Robert Huff wrote:
[ ... ]
> Just wondering... if one installed 4.9, would the system be stuck with really 
> outdated userland apps?  or would CVSup be able to update the userland ports, 
> without changing the base system?

A FreeBSD 4.9 installation will contain quite modern userland applications. 
You can use cvsup to update both the sources for userland or for the ports 
collection.

You can also install a port (by default things go under /usr/local) to get a 
newer version of software than what FreeBSD ships, but the base system and 
ports are kept seperate (by default, again).

> This way, one can get an update(perhaps unstable) userland, but need not fear 
> the OS crashing...

If you want maximum stability, track RELENG_4_9 for now; otherwise track 
-STABLE (which is RELENG_4, currently).

-- 
-Chuck



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4034FAE2.3010403>