Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:06:52 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Contemplating THIS change to signals. (fwd)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203071606050.37321-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <15495.63816.189506.113294@caddis.yogotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Nate Williams wrote:

> > My suggestion is to stop making STOP type signals an exception,
> > because it should not be necessary to stop them in the middle of a
> > syscall, just stop them from getting back to userspace.
> 
> What about when you suspend a process in the middle of read/write, which
> are syscalls?  This kind of behavior is *extremely* common-place


hmm can you explain what you mean? I can't think of anything 
that would change..

> 
> 
> 
> Nate
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0203071606050.37321-100000>