Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:37:36 +0100 From: Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 Message-ID: <20080306013736.GD1500@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0802291820j58a24de7wb39ebf2a2653f579@mail.gmail.com> References: <47C59591.6040600@errno.com> <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCOEHACFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <3aaaa3a0802290744x25a81d68vf0ff101f6b7a819e@mail.gmail.com> <1204302128.2126.150.camel@localhost> <3aaaa3a0802290854t639559b6if0adc4009997e9db@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660802291806l53fcd852qb117a647ce6c93d5@mail.gmail.com> <3aaaa3a0802291820j58a24de7wb39ebf2a2653f579@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 02:20:58AM +0000, Chris wrote: > On 01/03/2008, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 01/03/2008, Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > You working round what I just said. A nic should perform equally well > > > as it does in other operating systems just because its cheaper its n= ot > > > an excuse for buggy performance. There is also other good network > > > cards apart from intel pro 1000. I am talking about stability not > > > performance, I expect a intel pro 1000 to outperform a realtek howev= er > > > I expect both to be stable in terms of connectivity. I expect a > > > realtek in freebsd to perform as well as a realtek in windows and > > > linux. :) > > > > Patches please! > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > -- > > Adrian Chadd - adrian@freebsd.org > > >=20 > Ironically the latest server I got last night has a intel pro 1000 a rari= ty :) >=20 > I am just giving feedback as when I speak to people in the datacentre > and hosting business the biggest gripe with freebsd is hardware > compatability, as I adore freebsd I ignore this and work round it but > its defenitly reducing take up. >=20 > Of course I know current re issues are getting attention which I am > thankful for, I fully understand the time and effort required to write > drivers patches etc. and have got no critisicms for the people who do > this my complaint is more focused on people claiming there is no > issues its just the hardware. >=20 Pyun YongHyeon has fixed a lot of driver issues (i.e. re(4), bfr(4), vr(4)) over the last few months, many are already in CURRENT or RELENG_7 (not sure how many of them made it into 7.0-RELEASE) or posted as patches to the current@ mailing list. If you have problems, please see if they persist with a CURRENT snapshot. If they do, please post to the current@ mailing list with details. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHz0rgbHYXjKDtmC0RAmjwAJoCsP1l1EZCY8P0APJM6gZ0r4CeFgCg5SWV Lt0C6XvcWdn22iV5ApSXmXE= =uvpp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080306013736.GD1500>