Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:36:50 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" <Danovitsch@Vitsch.net> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: differences in USB support between FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x ? Message-ID: <20030722123649.GM511@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <200307220004.21883.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net> References: <20030721071842.GC58121@cobweb.example.org> <20030721130013.GI19386@cicely12.cicely.de> <200307220004.21883.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote: > On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote: > > > [I sent the same message to usb-bsd@eleetbsd.org, but since that list > > > seems not very active, I am asking here too] > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > the subject says it all. > > > > > > I am considering using FreeBSD for a robotics project, and I am > > > thinking of using 4.x for stability. But, since we will probably use > > > USB a lot, I am wondering if maybe 5.x is a better choice. > > > > I believe 4.x has all you need for your project. > > If you really find a problem then the missing part can be MFC'ed. > Both 4.x and 5.x have a pointer-bug in the ugen-driver causing memory to be > overwritten outside a buffer when using isochronous transfers. I have sent a > PR about this (with patch) back in April. > **(: HINT HINT :) ** > ( pr kern/51186 : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern%2F51186 ) I'll take a look at this. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722123649.GM511>