Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 16:00:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: will@physics.purdue.edu Cc: roam@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <200110272001.f9RK0fa89495@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20011026142111.B25747@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 Oct, Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:49:29PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) >> post-install: >> [...] >> .endif >> >> makes a better bikeshed than: >> >> post-install: >> .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) >> [...] >> .endif > > Not really. As far as ports are concerned, they are essentially the > same thing. You removed my reasoning. You are right, the port would not care, but I'd expect it to be a little bit more efficient, because deep down in make(1)'s data structures there will be one less target to record. And make(1) parses a port's Makefile numerous times... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110272001.f9RK0fa89495>