Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:27:55 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <504F4A6B.4010001@coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11-09-2012 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-09-11 15:24, Steve Kargl wrote: >> What is important is whether software built with clang functions >> correctly. See for example, >> >> http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp >=20 > Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of > clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a > high priority item for upstream. >=20 > This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will > care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about > licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using > gcc for the time being. Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions? --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBPSnAACgkQfoCS2CCgtivMWQD/VQ92Zv0/xh1leFgSZlnBjQQY 72yUvBStfMih/BvtiQoA/jiyDeQ0pJJFfc63eOjeVVstprPzYaX0V6XBOLdNDQTr =JkS9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?504F4A6B.4010001>