Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 05:29:31 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: New wrinkle on doscmd build failures. Message-ID: <29784.906726571@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cc -O -pipe -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -DDISASSEMBLER -I/usr/obj/elf/h/local/src /tmp/usr/include -o doscmd AsyncIO.o ParseBuffer.o bios.o callback.o cpu.o dos. o cmos.o config.o cwd.o debug.o disktab.o doscmd.o ems.o emuint.o exe.o i386-pin sn.o int.o int10.o int13.o int14.o int16.o int17.o int1a.o int2f.o intff.o mem.o mouse.o net.o port.o setver.o signal.o timer.o trace.o trap.o tty.o xms.o -L/u sr/X11R6/lib -lX11 tty.o: In function `video_setborder': tty.o(.text+0x25f): undefined reference to `XSetWindowBackground' tty.o: In function `setgc': tty.o(.text+0x2f5): undefined reference to `XChangeGC' root@kickme-> file /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.1: FreeBSD/i386 compact demand paged shared library not stripped Could it be that the folks compiling this are doing it with ELF X11 libs? I think that it must be strongly considered as a possibility that even people running full ELF systems will continue to have a.out X11 libs on their systems for awhile afterwards (since you can still RUN all the old stuff, there's less pressure to go rebuild/install it if you're not building X things as a matter of course) and I wouldn't want to watch the make world failures come back as a result. I still think that things which depend on X should either do so even more selectively (an environment variable?) or not be in /usr/src. We got rid of xroach and xditview in /usr/src for exactly that reason. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29784.906726571>