Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 16:49:24 +0900 From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <masafumi@pobox.com> To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu Cc: masafumi@pobox.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about porting (what if pkgname and exec name of depends differ?) Message-ID: <199603260749.QAA18145@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Mar 1996 22:19:09 -0800 (PST)" References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960325221806.236C-100000@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: about porting (what if pkgname and exec name of depends differ?)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 22:19:09 -0800 (PST)
> > RUN_DEPENDS= perl5.002:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
> > BUILD_DEPENDS= perl5.002:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
> ^ Should there be a dash here?
>
> > Configuring and Building processes go well with this setting.
> > However, when I run pkg_add or pkg_delete, these programs try to write
> > dependency info into /var/db/pkg/perl5.002, where it actually should
> > be /var/db/pkg/perl-5.002.
>
> Above is my guess. I haven't used this process so it is a total shot in
> the dark, but there is a corellation.
Thanks for taking time to respond. It turned out, however, that
it was completely my mistake. (Well, I don't know what I did wrong,
but it goes smoothly now. I must've been confused. (Maybe because
this is my first time to make port from scratch.)
Thanks anyway.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Masafumi NAKANE, Keio Univ., Dept. of Environmental Information
E-Mail : t94303mn@sfc.keio.ac.jp / masafumi@pobox.com
[URL] : http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~t94303mn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603260749.QAA18145>