Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:07:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@sdf.com> To: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971006120407.21744C-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199710061405.KAA27927@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Jamie Bowden wrote: > I found gated much easier to deal with than UUCP. Must be an individual > thing. Not really relevant, but: It depends on your background. If you have a lot of mail backgroup, UUCP is fairly easy, because you now how things are supposed to fit together. If you have a lot of networking background, and know the different routing protocols and their features, configuring gated is pretty straightforward, because you know what you want to do, you just need to describe it. If you don't have exposure to the various routing protocols, and some understanding, you are pretty much dead in the water. > Jamie Bowden > System Administrator, iTRiBE.net > > Abusenet: The Misinformation Superhighway Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971006120407.21744C-100000>