Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:00:54 -0800 From: Brian Gardner <openjdk@getsnappy.com> To: Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie@oracle.com> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Helping out with JDK 9 on BSD Message-ID: <08F78FBA-70D2-4819-99BB-05476638726C@getsnappy.com> In-Reply-To: <8B9ACABA-F9B2-4288-9DB5-CA843DE48C34@getsnappy.com> References: <56ADE7D4.8020107@oracle.com> <56ADE943.6020103@oracle.com> <8B9ACABA-F9B2-4288-9DB5-CA843DE48C34@getsnappy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Magnus, I was able to clone the jdk9/dev repo, apply your patches, and compile = on FreeBSD 10.1 amd64, with some changes to the Serviceability Agent = ported from bad-port/jdk8 repo, however when I try to run javac I get a = bunch of messages like: Thread 832744400 has exited with leftover thread-specific data after 4 = destructor iterations I=E2=80=99m curious where you left off in getting "javac HelloWorld=E2=80=9D= working on FreeBSD? Brian Gardner > On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:57 AM, Brian Gardner <openjdk@getsnappy.com> = wrote: >=20 > I=E2=80=99m interested in helping. I ported openjdk6 to freebsd and = also helped out with openjdk8. >=20 > Brian Gardner >=20 >=20 >> On Jan 31, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie = <magnus.ihse.bursie@oracle.com <mailto:magnus.ihse.bursie@oracle.com>> = wrote: >>=20 >> On 2016-01-31 11:54, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> [TL;DR: I'm offering patches to compile JDK 9 on FreeBSD, but it's = not clear where to put them, or how.] >>>=20 >>> I'm working at Oracle on the OpenJDK build team and is responsible = for large parts of the build system of OpenJDK. Lately, I've been = playing around with FreeBSD (and other BSDs) in my free time, and I've = written a patch that will add build system support for FreeBSD, OpenBSD = and NetBSD in JDK 9 (tracked in = https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147795). >>>=20 >>> I started writing this when I realized that the jdk9 branch in the = OpenJDK bsd-port repository did not contain any BSD-specific changes at = all, and the old JDK 8 changes will not readily be portable, due to = major changes in the build system between JDK 8 and JDK 9. >>>=20 >>> I thought it would be a no-brainer to integrate these changes into = the JDK 9 mainline, so they would be in place for whenever you guys = would start to attack porting the code base. However, some of my = collegues thought otherwise. The end result, I think, is that they = wanted to see someone (not necessarily a company, the FreeBSD = organisation for instance seemed to be okay), to step forward and say = "we take responsibility for the BSD port", and give some kind of = commitment to actually use these build changes in producing a viable = port. You can read the mail conversation here: = http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2016-January/016421.html >>=20 >> I forgot to add that I'm willing to help with build issues for the = BSD port, as far as my (like everybode else's) limited free time allows = me. Unfortunately, I'm still a noob at BSD internals and can't really = help with much apart from that. >>=20 >> /Magnus >>=20 >>=20 >>>=20 >>> An alternative to pushing this code into the JDK 9 mainline is of = course to push it to the bsd-port/jdk9 repo (given that the owners of = that repo approves), but that seems like a less favourable solution. = Having the code in the mainline does not mean that it gets tested = automatically, but it means that it will be part of e.g. refactoring, = that would otherwise break a downstream patchset. >>>=20 >>> I cc:ed this conversation to the bsd-port-dev@openjdk.java.net = mailing list, but never got any kind of official response there. Since = this list seems more active, I'm trying here instead. :) >>>=20 >>> So, I'm offering two patches here, one that applies to the build = system, is nice and clean, and possible to integrate into JDK 9 = mainline, if my collegues are convinced that someone is backing up the = BSD port. And there's a second patch, which fixes broken C/C++/Java code = and results in a product that can at least run "javac HelloWorld", but = this is not yet clean enough for integration anywere, at least not the = JDK 9 mainline. (I don't know enough of the BSD internals to fix all = problems, so there's some "#if 0" code here and there.) >>>=20 >>> /Magnus >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-java@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org> = <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>> = mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java = <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java> = <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java = <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = <mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org> = <mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = <mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>>" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org> mailing = list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java = <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org = <mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08F78FBA-70D2-4819-99BB-05476638726C>