Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:40:21 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3) Message-ID: <20090226184021.GZ19161@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0902261329330.12228@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20090226180756.GX19161@hoeg.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0902261315150.12228@sea.ntplx.net> <20090226182543.GY19161@hoeg.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0902261329330.12228@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: > Well, as long as you're in there, maybe you should add > symbol versioning anyway, even after a library version > bump. Seems like it would be easy since there aren't > that many symbols. I assume I should just mark all symbols with version FBSD_1.1? If so, the following patch should be good enough: http://80386.nl/pub/mp.diff --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmm4hUACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWmyQCfbk1CvgA1dIIG1L2IiokLO2uB pvgAnj0SHjznLFnbAQoIypWi9iOST+73 =Z/wx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yBbBYFH0ZHvzMoI/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090226184021.GZ19161>