Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:41:40 +0100 From: Jonathan Anderson <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call graphs with bsd.obj.mk Message-ID: <CAMGEAwAyF3nXFOrnOGkeHMat8UpPB0=2MRhZehPw9_bYLTyPXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1135E0EA-319C-4AB9-B282-59CDEA9020C8@neville-neil.com> References: <CAMGEAwCNuF-P80XgsMBm1a=vSPBhB_GNw%2Bqw5ZUmPXRC2NrsGQ@mail.gmail.com> <1135E0EA-319C-4AB9-B282-59CDEA9020C8@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 September 2012 21:54, George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> wrote: > This would be great to have in the tree as a real build target. Do you mean: a) a manual build target for binaries and libraries (as-is), b) an automatically-built target (for systems with llvm), c) a top-level build target (e.g. "make callgraphs") or d) something else entirely? I'd be very happy to commit (a) almost immediately if there is a consensus to do so; something like (b) would require a more careful approach so as to not break builds on boxes/architectures that don't have llvm-link or opt available. Also, while (a) could be committed almost immediately, using it requires either: - PREFIX_TOOLS not suppressing llvm-link and opt in the bootstrap tools dir (chasing this angle with brooks@) or - installing the llvm-devel port Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org http://freebsd.org/~jonathan/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMGEAwAyF3nXFOrnOGkeHMat8UpPB0=2MRhZehPw9_bYLTyPXg>