Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Mar 2014 11:43:28 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0?
Message-ID:  <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 6, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote:

>=20
>=20
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
>> I wonder why
>>=20
>> bsdtar --one-file-system
>>=20
>> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention of=20=

>> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :(
>>=20
>=20
>     --one-file-system
>             (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points.
>=20
> Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Was
> it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're
> seeing.

Before it would archive the directory where the other filesystem was =
mounted, but nothing else.

Now it doesn=92t archive that directory.

I believe this is a bug, since that directory (but nothing in it or =
under it) still belongs to this filesystem...

Warner





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85>