Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:07:43 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Hodges <rh@matriplex.com> To: atm_roberto@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (FreeBSD TCP) vs (Linux TCP) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10203070903550.351-100000@mail.matriplex.com> In-Reply-To: <200203071515.g27FFDu63200@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> on Thu, 7 Mar 2002 02:48:52 -0800 (PST), Russo Roberto said: > > > I am working to evaluate performance of > > throughput between two PC connected between > > a Fore-ATM card adapter to a network: > > the netwotk is composed of a PVC of 4Mbps between > > three routers and I am just looking to use > > differente queuing discipline like FIFO-PQ-WFQ. > > > > I have configured the two PC with the same Operating > > Systems: a Linux (Red-Hat) and a FreeBSD v4.3 (Kame > > Patch) and I am using NETPERF to make throughput > > test. On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, mark tinguely wrote: > I would suggest that you run FreeBSD 4.5. There was a long-hidden socket bug > that under certain situation caused the socket mechanism to go idle for a > lengthy period of time and this caused performance issues. This socket > problem was fixed in the FreeBSD 4.5 release. There was also the bug in the Fore PCA200E driver (device hfa) from 4.1 to 4.3 that caused massive packet loss. -Richard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10203070903550.351-100000>