Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Subject: Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS Message-ID: <CAETOPp0PZb7BJtz4D6b7P5eAKujmEdoru78gm-tK8Hsa%2Bv2vyw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150511093100.GC53149@e-new.0x20.net> References: <554BB84F.7060605@FreeBSD.org> <554BCD4C.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <CAGHfRMAc4XwqME8Nmi05oy1HBWZZTGLsWoXwkQw3W542GCZB1g@mail.gmail.com> <3137063.YOSa6Au8Xi@ralph.baldwin.cx> <554D1DD5.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <CACYV=-F5RUVNmhqX13=EndiZhKPMSgp93QjWVJx2QZn1zMbTyA@mail.gmail.com> <554E2221.1040105@FreeBSD.org> <D094B054-D5BE-482A-8DDF-E4728934E892@orthanc.ca> <CAETOPp0WgHaWeibOcX_D5=LG4gKqFEmdgnFkA9HEtyhLF%2BTbsg@mail.gmail.com> <20150511093100.GC53149@e-new.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" <lars.engels@0x20.net> wrote: > > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to > > import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better > > tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn > > something new, which I know can be a challenge. > > I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it would soon > be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages. It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better installed from ports/packages, too. It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS. Jos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAETOPp0PZb7BJtz4D6b7P5eAKujmEdoru78gm-tK8Hsa%2Bv2vyw>