Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 18:44:42 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu, roam@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20011027184442.V25747@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200110272001.f9RK0fa89495@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20011026142111.B25747@squall.waterspout.com> <200110272001.f9RK0fa89495@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:00:38PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > You removed my reasoning. You are right, the port would not care, but > I'd expect it to be a little bit more efficient, because deep down in > make(1)'s data structures there will be one less target to record. And > make(1) parses a port's Makefile numerous times... No. make(1) parses a port's Makefile only once per invocation. The same goes for bsd.port.mk; if something .include bsd.port.mk then it will be parsed there. Not again. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011027184442.V25747>