Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:09:34 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Per Jail Memory Limits Message-ID: <20091005190934.GX2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4ACA4391.6020607@tomjudge.com> References: <4ACA0549.7030404@tomjudge.com> <4ACA2E0F.5010800@elischer.org> <4ACA3146.9090402@tomjudge.com> <20091005190213.GV2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4ACA4391.6020607@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--21/Vc5rId7THQcsT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:05:53PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:47:50PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > > =20 > >>I started to port this to 7.1 today: > >> > >>http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits > >> > >> > >>What are the peoples opinions on this patch? > >> =20 > > > >Since r194766, we have precise accounting for the anonymous memory, > >both globally and per-uid. If current jails infrastructure allows to > >set per-jail limits (and I suspect that it is), then you should > >just match these two facilities. > > > >The seemingly problematic thing is processes changing their jails. > >It can be done similar to how the uid accounting is done currently, > >by remembering which jail was charged in corresponding vm map > >entry and object. > > =20 >=20 > Did this get MFC'd to stable/7? No, and never will be. >=20 > I have a requirement to implement this for 7.1. >=20 > Thanks --21/Vc5rId7THQcsT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrKRG4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g+yACgrRE88p4H/OTIWfTDeNaXJSba PwAAnAlBqDP2YsAaRVaRAEKfikJyQX74 =EX+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --21/Vc5rId7THQcsT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091005190934.GX2259>